|
Project No.
Study Title: Genotoxicity Assay of Ammonium
Perchlorate
Sponsor:
Mike Dourson
TERA
2300 Montana Avenue, Suite 409
Cincinnati, OH 45211
Contract Laboratory:
Cellular & Molecular Toxicology Program
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc.
2 Triangle Dr.
Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709
Proposed Schedule:
1. Starting Date: January 20, 1998
2. Completion Date: April 24, 1998
3. Final Report Date: May 26, 1998
Approvals:
_______________________ ______________
Project Officer Date
________________________ ______________
Study Director Date
(Cellular & Molecular Toxicology Program)
Protocol for the Genotoxicity Assay of
Ammonium Perchlorate
I. Overall Objectives:
Research will be conducted to determine the potential
genotoxicity associated with the exposure to ammonium perchlorate
(AP), a chemical that is being considered for potential military
and space application.
Three short-term genotoxic assays will be used to examine the
genotoxicity of ammonium perchlorate, which include:
1. Salmonella/Mammalian microsome reverse mutation assay
- per EPA (TSCA) Health Efect Testing Guidelines
(40 CFR 798.5265)
2. Mouse lymphoma assay
- per EPA (TSCA) Health Efect Testing Guidelines
(40 CFR 798.5300)
3. In vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
- per EPA (TSCA) Health Efect Testing Guidelines
(40 CFR 798.5395)
II. Salmonella/Mammalian Microsome Reverse Mutation
Assay
II-A. Purpose
The Salmonella/Mammalian microsome reverse mutation system is
a microbial assay which measures the reversion from his-
(histidine dependent) to his+ (histidine independent) induced by
chemicals which cause base changes or frameshift mutations in the
genome of this organism.
II-B. Background
A reverse mutation assay using Salmonella typhimurium detects
mutations in a gene of a histidine requiring strains to produce a
histidine independent strain of this organism. A reverse mutation
can be achieved by base pair changes, which may occur at the site
of the original mutation or at a second site in the chromosome;
or by frameshift mutations resulted from the addition or deletion
of single or multiple base pairs in the DNA molecule.
In this assay, bacteria are exposed to the test agent with and
without a metabolic activation system and plated onto minimum
agar medium which is deficient in histidine. After a suitable
period of incubation, revertant colonies are counted and compared
with the number of spontaneous revertants in an untreated and /
or vehicle control culture. The mutagenicity of the test agents
is evident by the increased number of revertants.
II-C. Test Methods
1. Tester strains:
Four tester strains will be used in this assay, which include
TA1535 and TA100 for the detection of base pair mutagens, and
TA1537 and TA98 for the detection of frameshift mutagens. The
tester strains will be obtained from Dr. Bruce N. Ames in
University of Califonia, CA.
2. Confirmation of the genotypes of the tester strains:
Following genotypes should be confirmed in each tester strain
based on the methods described by Maron and Ames (1983) prior to
the mutagenesis study:
- Requirement of histidine for growth (His-)
- Sensitivity to Crystal violet (rfa mutation)
- Sensitivity to U.V. light (uvB mutation)
- Resistance to ampicillin (R factor)
- Spontaneous revertant
3. Bacteria growth:
Fresh culture of the tester strains should be used for each
assay.
The bacteria are cultured in nutrient broth at 37oC water bath with shaking for 10-12
hours to reach the late exponential or early stationary phase of
growth (108-109 cells per ml).
4. Metabolic activation:
The test compound should be examined both in the presence and
absence of an appropriate metabolic activation system. The most
commonly used activation system in this assay is S9 mixture, a
cofactor supplemented postmitochondrial fraction prepared from
the liver of rats treated with enzyme inducers such as
Aroclor-1254.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (b.w. ~200 g) are treated with
Aroclor 1254 by i.p. injection at a dose of 200 mg/kg body
weight. Five days later animals are sacrificed by cervical
dislocation and the livers are collected, homogenized in 0.15 M
KCl. The homogenate is centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 minutes. The
supernatant is aliquoted and stored at -80oC
as the S9 used in the assay.
5. Test agent:
Ammonium Perchlorate will be freshly dissolved in sterile
distilled water to the required concentrations. A prescreening
test including 5 log doses (with 5 mg/plate as the top dose) will
be conducted in TA100 for the dose selection. Toxicity will be
evident by a reduction in the spontaneous revertants per plate,
and /or a clearing of the background lawn. Five concentrations
with adequate intervals will be selected and tested in the
mutagenesis.
6. Controls:
In each assay, following concurrent controls will be set up:
a. Negative and solvent controls:
Untreated cultures with and without S9 mixture are set up as
negative control. They are used for the measurement of
spontaneous revertants, which will serve as the background level
of reverse mutation. Appropriate solvent controls will also be
included in each assay.
b. Positive control:
Positive controls with known mutagens shall ensure the
responsiveness of the tester strains as well as the efficacy of
the activation system. Sodium azide (without S9) will be the
positive control for TA1535 and TA100. The positive controls for
TA98 and TA1537 are 2-aminofluorene (with S9) and 9-aminoacridine
(without S9), respectively. The above positive control agents
will be dissolved in DMSO.
7. Mutagenesis assay (plate incorporation method):
All dose points (with and without S9 mixture) will be set up
in triplicates. 0.1 ml of the culture is added to 2 ml of top
agar which is melt and held at 45oC
heating block, along with 0.1 ml of the test agent, and 0.5 ml of
S9 mixture (in S9+ plates only). The contents aare mixed and then
poured onto the surface of a minimum glucose agar plate and
spreaded out evenly. The top agar is allowed to solidify and the
plates are inverted and incubated at 37oC
for 48 hours. The number of revertants per dish is counted by an
automatic colony counter.
II-D. Data collection and reporting
The number of revertants per dish will be determined by
automatic colony counter, and the results are stored and
processed by computer (Excel spreadsheets). Following specific
information will be reported for the Salmonella mutagenesis
assay: (1) Tester strains used (results of genotypic
confirmation), (2) Metabolic activation system used (source,
amount, cofactors, method for preparation), (3) Dose levels and
the rationale for their selection, (4) Positive and negative
controls, (5) Individual plate counts, means, and standard
deviation, and (6) Dose response relationship if applicable.
II-E. Result analysis and interpretation
1. Criteria for acceptability:
The data generated will be considered acceptable if:
- The spontaneous revertant frequency is in the normal
range as reported in the literature or within the
laboratory's historical range.
- A sufficient number of nontoxic concentrations have been
tested.
- The strain-specific positive mutagens significantly
increase the revertant in the corresponding strains.
2. Criteria for interpretation:
a. Positive result:
A compound will be considered positive in this assay if a
dose-dependent increase in the number of revertants is observed
in three concentrations, and the highest increase in TA1535 and
TA1537 is equal to three times the spontaneous control value or
the highest increase in TA98 and TA100 is equal to two times the
spontaneous level (Brusick and Hayes, 1989). Sometimes the
precise fold increase will not be necessary if a clear
dose-dependent pattern is noted over several concentrations.
A positive result in Salmonella/microsome mutagenesis
indicates that under the experimental conditions, the test
compound induces point mutation by base changes or frameshift in
the genome of this organism.
b. Negative result:
A test agent will be considered negative in this assay if the
criteria for positive response are not met, and the tester
strains are sensitive to the positive mutagens.
A negative result indicates that under the experimental
conditions, the test compound is not mutagenic in Salmonella
typhimuriumm.
III. Mouse Lymphoma Assay
III-A. Purpose
Mammalian cell culture systems can be used to detect mutations
induced by chemical substances. One of the most commonly used
mammalian cell mutagenesis system, the L5178Y mouse lymphoma-TK
assay detects the mutations at the thymidine kinase locus caused
by base pair changes, frameshift and small deletions. Mutant
cells deficient in TK due to the forward mutation in the TK locus
(from TK+ to TK-) are resistant to the cytotoxic effect of
pyrimidine analogues such as bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU),
fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU) or trifluorothymidine (TFT). The
mutagenicity of the test agents is indicated by the increase in
the number of mutants after treatment.
III-B. Background
Thymidine monophosphate (TMP) occupies a unique position in
DNA replication. Of the four principle deoxyribonucleotide
monophosphates, TMP alone does not undergo significant conversion
to other nucleotides. This conservation makes the TMP pool size
quite small and constant under normal growth condition, which
serves as a regulator for DNA synthesis. If the TME is replaced
by other lethal TMP analogues, the cell will be killed. The
phosphorylation of these analogues is mediated by the
"salvage" enzyme thymidine kinase (TK), which normally
phosphorylates thymidine to TMP in most mammalian cells.
TK-deficient cells lack this enzyme activity and therefore are
resistant to the cytotoxic effect of the lethal analogues. In the
mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay, the TK-conpetent
L5178Y (TK+/+ or TK+/-) cells are treated with the test agents.
After certain period of expression, the cells are shifted to a
selective medium containing the lethal analogues such as
bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU) or
trifluorothymidine (TFT). Only the mutant cells (TK-/-) can
survive under the selection condition, and the mutagenicity of
the test compound is evident by the increase in the number of
mutants.
III-C. Test Methods
1. Cells and culture maintenance:
The L5178Y TK+/- mouse
lymphoma cells, clone 3.7.2C are used throughout the study, which
were originally obtained from Dr. Donald Clive of former
Burroughs Wellcome Co. (Research Triangle park, NC). The cells
used in the mutagenesis assay should have a high cloning
efficiency and low spontaneous mutation frequency. The cells are
maintained as suspension culture in F10p
media in culture flasks equilibrated with 5% CO2.95%
air and incubated at 37oC in a
rotary shaker.
The cells have a doubling time as 10-11 hours. Each week the
cells will be grown in the F10p
media containing THMG (thymidine, hypoxanthine, methotrexate and
glycine) to select against newly arising TK-/- mutants, and then
placed in in the F10p media
containing THG (thymidine, hypoxanthine, and glycine) for 1-3
days prior to use in mutagenesis study.
2. Metabolic activation system:
Cells will be exposed to the test agent both in the presence
and absence of an appropriate metabolic activation system.
Cofactor- supplemented liver S9 from Aroclor-induced rats will be
prepared as described by Mitchell et al (1988) and used in each
assay.
3. Test agent:
Ammonium Perchlorate will be freshly dissolved with distilled
water prior to each use. A preliminary range finding experiment
will be conducted using 10 doses over a 3-4 log range with 5000
ug/ml as the top concentration. The procedures for range finding
are identical to that used for mutagenesis except that the
cultures are terminated after 24-48 hours without further
cloning. The toxicity is indicated by the decrease of cell number
in the suspension culture comp[ared with that in untreated
control. Four to five concentrations will be selected based on
the result and used in the mutagenesis assay. The highest dose
should produce a low level of survival (approximately 10%), and
the survival in the lowest dose should be the same as the
negative control.
4. Controls:
Negative control without treatment and positive control with
known mutagens should be included in each assay. Ethyl
methanesulfonate (EMS, wihtpout S9 mixture) and
3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA with S9 mixture) will be used as the
positive controls. Both mutagens are dissolved in DMSO, and
corresponding solvent control will also be included.
5. Mutagenesis assay:
a. Exposure:
Cells (6x106 cells in 10 ml
medium for each culture) are treated with test agents with and
without S9 mixture, and incubated at 37oC
with rotation for 4 hours. Chemicaals are removed and cells are
washed twice by centrifugation then resuspended in non-selective
medium at a density of 3x105
cells/ml, and maintained in roller drum for 2 days at 37oC.
b. Expression:
The 2 day maintenance after exposure is the expression period
for mutation. During this period, cell density is checked daily
and adjusted to 3x105 cells/ml.
c. Cloning:
On the second day of expression, cells are seeded onto soft
agar medium to determine the survival and the mutation frequency.
For each dose group, 3 cultures containing 200 cells/dish in
non-selective medium are set up for viability measurement,
another set of 3 cultures with 1x106
cells/dish in selective medium containing TFT are used for mutant
counting. Dishes are incubated at 37oC
in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.95%
air.
d. Colony counting:
Colonies are counted 11-12 days after cloning using an
automatic colony counter. The mutant frequency is calculated and
adjusted based on the survival percentage.
III-D. Data collection and reporting
All the original records about cell maintenance, medium and
chemical preparation, cell counts, S9 preparation, details for
experimental set-up of range finding and mutagenesis assay will
be kept in standard forms. Results will be expressed in tabular
form which include colony forming efficiecy (CFE %), relative CFE
(RCFE), number of mutants, mutation frequency (MF) and relative
mutation frequency (RMF) for each culture. Specifically for the
mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay , following information
will be included in the report: 1. Cells (type, number of
cultures, methods for maintenance), 2. test agents (dose
selection and rationale). 3. Experimental conditions (incubation
temperature, CO2 concentration,
treatment schedule, cell density, metabolic activation system and
its preparation, positive and negative controls, length of
expression, selective agent and concentration, etc.).
III-E. Result analysis and interpretation
1. Criteria for acceptability:
The data generated will be considered acceptable if:
a. The spontaneous mutation frequency is in the normal range
as reported in the literature or within the laboratory's
historical range.
b. The test system is sensitive to the known mutagen as judged
by the results in the concurrent positive control cultures.
2. Criteria for interpretation:
a. Positive result:
A test agent will be considered to be positive in the mouse
lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay if it induces a statistically
significant dose-related increase in the mutant frequency, or
generates a reproducible and statistically significant increase
in the mutant frequency for at least one concentration.
A positive result in mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay
indicates that under the experimental conditions, the test
compound induces gene mutation in the cells used.
b. Negative result:
A test agent which does not produce either a statistically
significant dose-related increase, or a reproducible and
statistically significant increase of the mutant frequency in any
one of the concentrations tested will be considered nonmutagenic
in this system.
A negative result indicates that under the experimental
conditions, the test compound does not produce gene mutation in
the cells used.
3. Statistical analysis:
The toxicity of the test agent will be indicated by a decrease
in CFE (or relative CFE, RCFE), which will be determined as
follows:
CFE (%) = number of colonies/number of cells plated x 100%
RCFE = CFE in treated culture/CFE in negative control
The mutagenicity of the test agent will be evident by the
increase in mutation frequency (MF, or expressed as relative
mutation frequency, RMF) based on the number of mutants and
adjusted by the survival fraction of cells:
MF= No. of mutants/ No. of clonable cells x 106
RMF = MF in treated culture/MF in negative control
The differences in CFE and MF between control and treated
cultures are evaluated by a two-tail Student's t-test. The
dose-dependent response is examined by the linear regression.
IV. In Vivo
Mouse Bone Marrow Micronucleus Test
IV-A. Purpose
The in vivo mammalian micronucleus test detects the
damage of chromosome or mitotic apparatus caused by chemicals.
Polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in bone marrow of rodents are
used in this assay. When the erythroblast develops into an
erythrocyte, the main nucleus is extruded and may leave a
micronucleus in the cytoplasm. The visualization of the
micronucleus is facilitated in the PCEs because they lack the
main nucleus. Micronuclei form under normal conditions. The assay
is based on an increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCEs
in bone marrow of the treated animals.
IV-B. Background
Micronuclei are small particles consisting of acentric
fragments of chromosome or entire chromosomes, which lag behind
at anaphase of cell division. After telophase these fragments may
not be included in the nuclei of the daughter cells and form
single or multiple micronuclei in the cytoplasm. The clastogenic
effect or mitotic apparatus damaging effect of the test agent
will be evident by the increased frequency of micronucleated PCEs
in the bone marrow.
IV-C. Test Methods
1. Experimental animals:
Swiss CD-1 mice, both sex, 8-10 week old will be used in the
study. Animals will be procured from Charles River Laboratory.
Five males and five females will be included for each test group.
Animals are quarantined for 1 week, and then randomized and
assigned to treatment and control groups.
2. Test agent:
Ammonium Perchlorate will be dissolved in distilled water
prior to each use and administered by single intraperitoneal
(i.p.) injection. In the initial assessment of cytotoxicity, one
dose will be used which is the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) or to
a maximum of 5000 mg/kg. The cytotoxicity will be judged by a
decrease in the ratio of PCEs/NCEs (normochromatic erythrocytes)
in the bone marrow. Three doses will be used in the dose-response
study.
3. Controls:
Concurrent negative control (without treatment) and positive
control (cyclophosphamide, a known micronucleus inducer dissolved
in physical saline) will be included. Animals in the negative
control group are used for the measurement of background
frequency of micronucleated cells, and the positive control is
used to verify the responsiveness of the test system. Saline
controls are also included.
4. Dosing and sampling:
Since the in vivo pharmacokinetic information of the
test agent is unavailable, the experiment will be conducted by
the one-dose, one-sampling protocol, one of the most commonly
used schedule for this assay. Briefly, the test compounds will be
dissolved in distilled water or appropriate solvents, and
administered by single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection.
Twenty-four hours after the injection, mice are sacrificed and
bone marrow cells are collected.
5. Preparation of bone marrow smears:
The bone marrow cells will be collected and suspended in 3 ml
fetal bovine serum. After centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5
minutes, the pellet will be resuspended with a few drops of FBS,
and smears prepared on standard microscopic slides.
6. Staining of the slides:
The slides will be stained the next day of preparation by
May-Gruenwald and Giemsa solution as described by Schmid et al
(1975). The slides are treated with xylene for 5 minutes and then
embedded with coverslips.
7. Micronuclei observation:
The frequency of micronucleated cells are observeded in 1000
polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal. The PCEs/NCEs ratio
is determined by counting 1000 erythrocytes, and used as the
indicator of toxicity. Micronuclei are some round bodies in
cytoplasm with a diameter of 1/20 to 1/5 of an erythrocyte. They
stain intensively, similar to the staining of the main nuclei in
the nucleated cells.
IV-D. Data collection and reporting
All the original observation for micronucleated cell frequency
and PCEs/NCEs ratio will be recorded in standard scoring forms.
Criteria for scoring of micronuclei should be given. Individual
data will be presented in a tabular form which includes positive
control, negative control, solvent control and treatment groups.
The number of PCEs scored, the number of micronucleated PCEs, the
percentage of mucronucleated PCEs, and the ratio between PCEs and
NCEs will be listed separately.
The test report for micronucleus assay will also include the
following specific information: 1. Experimental animals (species,
age, body weight, sex, number), 2. Test agent (vehicle, doses and
rationale for dose selection), 3. Treatment and sampling
schedule, 4. Toxicity data, 5. Positive and negative controls, 6.
Procedures for slide preparation and staining, and 7. Criteria
for micronuclei identification.
IV-E. Result analysis and interpretation
1. Criteria for acceptability:
The data generated will be considered acceptable if:
a. The background frequency of micronucleated cells is in the
normal range as reported in the literature or within the
laboratory's historical range.
b. The test system is sensitive to the known mutagen as judged
by the results in the concurrent positive control animals.
2. Criteria for interpretation:
a. Positive result:
There are several criteria for determining a positive response
in the micronucleus assay. One of which is a statistically
significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated
PCEs. Another criterion is that a reproducible and statistically
significant increase in the micronucleated PCE frequency is
detected for at least one concentration.
A positive result in micronucleus test indicates that under
the experimental conditions, the test compound induces
micronuclei by the damages of either chromosome or mitotic
apparatus.
b. Negative result:
A test agent which does not produce either a statistically
significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated
PCEs, or a reproducible and statistically significant increase in
the micronucleated PCE frequency in any one of the concentrations
tested will be considered nonmutagenic in this system.
A negative result indicates that under the experimental
conditions, the test compound does not produce micronuclei in the
bone marrow of the test species.
3. Statistical analysis:
The differences in the micronucleated PCE frequency and the
ratio of PCEs/NCEs among treated and control animals are
statistically evaluated by Chi-square analysis, and the
dose-dependent response is examined by linear regression.
V. Identification, Handling and Storage and of the
Test Agent
The test agent, ammonium perchlorate will be provided by the
sponsor in solid powder form. All the chemical and physical
indentifications will be verified and information will be
provided by the manufacturer. The compound is highly soluble in
water (500 g/liter) and stable below 50oC.
It will be kept in sealed dark or opaque glass container and
stored at room temperture, avoiding direct sunlight and sudden
temperature rise. The primary routes of exposure include skin
absorption, ingestion and inhalation. Safety glasses, rubber
gloves, and protective clothing is needed for handling.
VI. Good Laboratory Practice and Quality Assurance
All assays will be conducted in accordance with the provisions
of the United States Environmental Protection Agency/Toxic
Substances Control Acts (EPA/TSCA) Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)
Standards as defined in the Federal Register (40 CFR, Part 792,
1992) and the TSCA Test Guidelines (40 CFR 798.5265, 40 CFR
798.5300, and 40 CFR 5395, 1992). All the procedures are
performed in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) of ManTech Environmental for the Salmonella/microsome
mutagenesis assay, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis and
mouse bone marrow cell micronucleus test.
The Quality Assurance Officer of ManTech Environmental Inc.
will document inspections on all procedures used in this study.
After the initiation of the study, modifications of the protocol
will be in the form of Protocol Amendments, which will state the
specific modifications and the reasons for the modifications.
VII. Schedule
In the starting phase (about 4 weeks), all the test agents,
media, equipments, cells, tester bacteria and animals will be
ordered. The genotypes of the tester strains will be confirmed,
and cells are maintained. The prescreening studies for dose
selection will also be conducted in this period. The 3
genotoxicity assays will be completed within 3 months (12 weeks).
Independent confirmatory experiments will be conducted for the
mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay and Salmonella/microsome
mutagenesis assay depending upon the decision of the sponsor.
Another month will be contributed to data analysis and report
preparation.
VIII. Reports and Deliverables
An interim technical progress report will be prepared and
submitted to the Project Officer, indicating the stage of
completion of the requested genotoxic assays on March 10, 1998.
The final report will be submitted by May 26, 1998. The study is
to be completed by April 24, 1998. The final report constitutes
the study's deliverable and ManTech considers acceptance of the
deliverable to occur when it is received by TERA.
IX. References:
Brusick D. (1989) In: Principles and Methods of
Toxicology, Second Edition, A.W. Hayes Ed., Raven Press, NY,
p424.
D.M. Maron and B.N. Ames (1983) Revised methods for the
Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Res., 113, 173-215.
A.D. Mitchell, B.C. Myhr, C.J. Ruddd, W.J. Caspary and V.C.
Dunkel (1988) Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell
mutagenesis assay: Methods used and chemicals evaluated. Environ.
Mol. Mutagen., 12 (suppl.13), 1-18.
W.Schmid (1975) The micronucleus test. Mutation Res., 31,
9-15.
|