Dose-Response Approaches for Nuclear Receptor-Mediated Modes of Action

 

 

 

Workshop held September 27-29, 2010 at NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA


Brief Report from Workshop

 


Sub-threshold doses for non-cancer and (in appropriate cases) cancer has been the dominant paradigm in human health risk assessment, but the application of dose-response modeling approaches with a threshold has been recently questioned (White, et al., 2009; NAS, 2008). The growing body of molecular toxicology information is allowing us to explore the presence or absence of sub-threshold doses for a number of receptor-mediated modes of action.


A recent workshop at the NIEHS explored the development of dose-response approaches to nuclear receptor-mediated liver cancer, within a Mode of Action (MOA) Human Relevance Framework (HRF). Case studies addressed activation of AHR, CAR, and PPARalpha receptors. For each case study a diverse and multi-disciplinary panel of experts from academia, industry, government and other organizations evaluated the key events leading to liver tumors. Each panel discussed whether the biology of the nuclear receptor necessitates a minimum threshold of ligand to affect activation, gene expression, and subsequent biological and toxicological responses. The panels also briefly discussed whether linear low-dose modeling was appropriate, based on the underlying science of nuclear receptor signaling biology.


The MOA/HRF provided a weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating discussion questions against the available data for each case study. The AHR expert panel, for the first time in an expert panel format, rigorously applied the MOA/HRF mode of action framework and agreed on a mode of action. Similarly, the CAR expert panel identified relevant data and applied the framework with emphasis on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of human relevance. For PPARalpha, the expert panel built upon previous applications of the framework using significant new data that allowed for refinement of the key event descriptions and updated considerations related to human relevance. Each panel identified key data needs and suggested improvements for application of the MOA/HRF framework. The public workshop had broad support and funding from industry, government, universities, scientific societies, and research organizations.

 

         

        Workshop Handouts

        •  

           

          Monday Plenary Presentations

          WebCast of Monday Morning Plenary Session

           

           

           

          Workshop Co-Chairs

          Melvin Andersen, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences

          Julian Preston, U.S. EPA

           

          Steering Committee

          Richard Becker, American Chemistry Council
          Robert Budinsky, Dow Chemical  Co.
          Michael Cunningham, NIEHS
          Vicki Dellarco, U.S. EPA
          Michael Dourson, Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment
          Cliff Elcombe, CXR Biosciences, University of Dundee Medical School
          James Klaunig, Indiana University
          Michael Honeycutt, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

           

          Sponsors

          Alliance for Risk Assessment

          American Chemistry Council's Center for Advancing Risk Assessment Science and Policy

          Chlorine Chemistry

          CropLife America

          CXR Biosciences

          DuPont

          The Hamner Institutes for Health

          Indiana University, Dept. of Environmental Health

          Society of Toxicology

          Society for Risk Analysis

          3M Company

          Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment

          U.S. EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
          U.S. EPA, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

          U.S.EPA, Office of Water

           

          Presentations on Results of the Nuclear Receptor Workshop:

          Updates

           

          Manuscripts are currently being prepared on the overall workshop and on each case study.  These are projected to be submitted for publication in late summer of 2011.  On the final day of the workshop, rapporteurs from each case study reported on the groups’ discussions and conclusions; slides from these presentations are available upon request (willis@tera.org). Note that the rapporteurs reports are point in time presentations that had little quality assurance and were designed to give a general report of what transpired that week and the broad conclusions. The full and detailed assessments will be available in the manuscripts. (3/17/11)

           

           

           

           

          For more information, contact Jacqueline Patterson (patterson@tera.org or 513-542-7475)