|
A tutorial
workshop
to be held in conjunction with
Society
for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting
Risk Analysis in a Dynamic World: Making a Difference
December 3-6, 2006 — Baltimore, Maryland
PRE-REGISTRATION
DEADLINE IS November 4, 2006
Workshop 3 -
HALF DAY
Replacing Default Values for
Uncertainty Factors with Chemical Specific Adjustment Factors:
Reducing Uncertainty in Noncancer Risk Assessment (organized by
Dr. Lynne Haber).
The World Health Organization, through
the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), has recently
established guidance on the use of mechanistic data to replace
default uncertainty factors for interspecies extrapolation and
intraspecies variability in deriving risk values such as Reference
Doses (RfDs) and Tolerable Concentrations (TCs). This guidance
informs the choice and application of data that can be used to
replace defaults with chemical specific adjustment factors (CSAFs).
CSAFs fall on the continuum of the use of data in deriving risk
values. At one end of the continuum is the use of the traditional
defaults, while at the other end is the use of extensive
chemical-specific data in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic
(PBPK) modeling, or even biologically-based dose-response (BBDR)
modeling. In between these two extremes are the use of categorical
defaults, such as the dosimetric approach used in the U.S. EPA’s RfC
and cancer risk assessment methods, and CSAFs. The CSAF framework
is based on early work by Renwick and applied by IPCS. This
approach first subdivides the uncertainty factors for interspecies
differences (UFA) and human variability (UFH) into toxicokinetic
(TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) components. The data relevant for each
subcomponent is then evaluated to determine whether
chemical-specific data can be used in place of the default. Any one
or all of these four subfactors can be replaced by chemical-specific
data. In the absence of chemical-specific data, default values of
2.5 and 4.0 have established for the TD and TK component of UFA,
while the default values for the TD and TK components UFH were each
established at one-half order of magnitude (3.2). Use of the CSAF
framework allows the improved use of available data in deriving risk
values, and can assist in targeting new studies to address
uncertainties and lead to more accurate risk values. CSAFs have
been used by the U.S. EPA in deriving an RfD for boron and by Health
Canada in deriving a TC for 2-butoxyethanol. This half-day workshop
will provide a brief review of the use of uncertainty factors and
historical perspective on the reliance on quantitative data to
develop values for inter- and intraspecies extrapolation. The
course will focus on the IPCS methodology for CSAF development,
including the thinking process and steps used for evaluating data.
Examples and classroom activities will be used as instructional
aids.
Overview of Topics
Course Overview and
Goals:
-
Incorporate thinking
about CSAF into routine development of noncancer risk values –
advantages of moving beyond defaults
-
Concepts:
-
kinetics vs. dynamics
-
uncertainty vs. variability
-
Data
needs for CSAF
-
Interspecies kinetics
-
Interspecies dynamics
-
Intraspecies kinetics
-
Intraspecies dynamics
-
Examples and class exercises
Presenters
Dr. Lynne Haber
has 14 years of experience in developing human health risk values
for a variety of government agencies and private sponsors, and in research
related to risk assessment methods. She
is the Research Program Manager at Toxicology Excellence for Risk
Assessment (TERA).
Her interests include the improved use of mechanistic data in risk
assessment, including incorporation of mode of action data in cancer risk
assessment, and use of data to replace default uncertainty factors.
She has been the lead author, coauthor, or reviewer of dozens of
detailed assessment documents. She
has served as a panel chairperson or panel member for scientific peer
reviews organized by TERA, EPA, and other U.S. and foreign government agencies.
She has also served on two panels for the NAS/NRC.
Lynne is active in communicating her findings to the broader
scientific community through participation in professional societies,
teaching courses in risk assessment methods, routine publication of her
work, service as an editorial reviewer for scientific journals, and
through presentation of invited lecturers.
Her published work includes lead authorship of the chapter on
noncancer risk assessment (including dose-response modeling methods) for
Patty’s Toxicology, and an invited review on the use of mechanistic data
in risk assessment. She was
also the coauthor for an analysis of the effect of genetic polymorphisms
on human variability in dose, using PBPK and Monte Carlo modeling.
She has published on methods for deriving occupational exposure
limits, and on incorporating toxicokinetic data into risk assessment.
She served as vice president and councilor of the SRA Dose-Response
specialty group, is a Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, and
is an officer of the SOT Risk Assessment Specialty Section (RASS).
Bette
Meek is the
Manager of the Existing Substances Division in the Environmental Health
Directorate of Health Canada. Her
responsibilities involve hazard and risk assessment for chemical
contaminants in the general environment.
She is also primarily responsible for the approach to assessment of
health effects of Existing Substances under the Canadian Environmental
Protection Act. She has
considerable experience in the evaluation of health-related data for the
derivation of guidelines for chemical contaminants of air and drinking
water. She has acted on
numerous occasions as advisor in this area to international organizations
(including the World Health Organization, the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development and the International Labour Organization),
including in the development of the CSAF methodology.
Ms. Meek graduated with an Honours B.Sc. in Biology from Queen's
University and an M.Sc. in Toxicology (with Distinction) from the
University of Surrey in the U.K, and has authored over 90 publications on
risk assessment of environmental contaminants.
Dr. John C. Lipscomb has a career (so far)
spanning 21 years of service in the U.S. government including service to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Air Force and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. He
received a PhD degree in Interdisciplinary Toxicology from the University
of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in 1991 and certification in General
Toxicology (DABT) from the American Board of Toxicology in 1995.
He is presently employed in the US EPA’s Office of Research and
Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment (Cincinnati, OH)
where he develops risk assessment guidance, technical assessments and
provides advice to chemical managers considering pharmacokinetic analyses
for their assigned chemicals. He
is well-published in the areas of chemical metabolism, toxicology,
pharmacokinetics and risk assessment.
His work has been recognized with awards of merit and commendation
medals from the Air Force, Army, EPA, and the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health. He
serves as an ad hoc reviewer for multiple journals and is on the editorial
boards for Toxicological Sciences
and Toxicology Mechanisms and
Methods. His interests
include continuing to improve the scientific basis for human health risk
assessment. He has developed
and provided guidance to risk assessors through publication in the open
scientific literature and by co-authoring several EPA guidance documents.
His work with the chemical manager was instrumental in replacing
the default values for toxicokinetic uncertainty in the oral reference
dose for boron and compounds, which is a precedent-setting assessment for
the US EPA. He has and
continues to provide service to the risk assessment and toxicology
communities through active support of the Spring Toxicology and Risk
Assessment Conference held annually near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Ohio; he is a past president of the Ohio Valley chapter of the Society of
Toxicology, the Dose-Response Specialty Group of SRA and he presently
serves as the President of the Ohio Chapter, SRA.
Registration
The
pre-registration fee is $175. After the
deadline, the registration is $200. You do not need to register
for the Annual Meeting to attend the workshop. To register, go to the
SRA website at
http://www.sra.org/events_2006_meeting.php and either register
online or print out and submit the registration form.
PRE-REGISTRATION
DEADLINE IS NOVEMBER 4, 2006
The event will
be held Sunday on December 3, 2006, at
Renaissance Harborplace
Hotel
202 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 USA
800-468-3571 (toll-free reservations)
410-547-1200 (direct to the hotel)
The room for
the event has not yet been determined; check with the hotel
concierge. To reserve a room at the hotel, call 800-468-3571 before 1
November 2006. Be sure to identify yourself as a SRA Annual Meeting
attendee to receive the SRA group rate of LAST YEAR'S RATE=$135 per
night (single or double occupancy) plus 12.5% tax. Cancellations
must be made at least 48 hours in advance. See a description of the
hotel at
http://www.marriott.com/dpp/PropertyPage.asp?MarshaCode=BWISH.
More information can be obtained from Dr. Lynne Haber
haber@tera.org, telephone 513-542-7475
ext. 17, fax 513-542-7487.
Related Links
Click here for more information
about TERA Training.
|